Climate Is Changing -- But Why?

That's the Question

When it comes to stirring up passionate feelings, romance can't hold a candle to the ongoing saga of global warming.

Not surprisingly, the climate controversy is once again a front-page news item, now that the new man in the White House has nullified the preceding administration's agreement to the 1997 Kyoto accords.

Under the pact, the United States would bear the brunt of reducing the world's future carbon dioxide emissions (CO2) -- a costly undertaking that is perhaps less popular today than ever, given the somewhat spooked national economy.

Opinions vary as to whether such emissions actually impact climate change.

There are basically two camps in the longtime, intense global warming debate -- those who say human activity is responsible for the earth's warming and those who decry this notion, saying the natural systems at work are much too vast to be influenced by human activity.

Intensifying the debate are those who charge that much of the verbal wrangling over the human contribution to global warming often is based on emotion rather than fact.

However, since the issue catapulted to prominence in the late 1980s, there has been a concerted effort to scientifically and methodically evaluate what actually is happening with the world climate -- and to what extent human beings figure in the big picture.

Pointing a Finger

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has emerged as the international voice on the science of global warming.

The IPCC is a United Nations organization with a mandate to provide policy makers with an objective assessment of the scientific, technical and socio-economic information available about climate change, its environmental and socio-economic impacts and possible response options.

"Each report by the IPCC reviews all the published literature over the previous five years or so," said Kevin Trenberth at the National Center for Atmospheric Research. "It assesses the state of knowledge, while attempting to reconcile disparate claims, resolve discrepancies and highlight uncertainties.

Please log in to read the full article

When it comes to stirring up passionate feelings, romance can't hold a candle to the ongoing saga of global warming.

Not surprisingly, the climate controversy is once again a front-page news item, now that the new man in the White House has nullified the preceding administration's agreement to the 1997 Kyoto accords.

Under the pact, the United States would bear the brunt of reducing the world's future carbon dioxide emissions (CO2) -- a costly undertaking that is perhaps less popular today than ever, given the somewhat spooked national economy.

Opinions vary as to whether such emissions actually impact climate change.

There are basically two camps in the longtime, intense global warming debate -- those who say human activity is responsible for the earth's warming and those who decry this notion, saying the natural systems at work are much too vast to be influenced by human activity.

Intensifying the debate are those who charge that much of the verbal wrangling over the human contribution to global warming often is based on emotion rather than fact.

However, since the issue catapulted to prominence in the late 1980s, there has been a concerted effort to scientifically and methodically evaluate what actually is happening with the world climate -- and to what extent human beings figure in the big picture.

Pointing a Finger

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has emerged as the international voice on the science of global warming.

The IPCC is a United Nations organization with a mandate to provide policy makers with an objective assessment of the scientific, technical and socio-economic information available about climate change, its environmental and socio-economic impacts and possible response options.

"Each report by the IPCC reviews all the published literature over the previous five years or so," said Kevin Trenberth at the National Center for Atmospheric Research. "It assesses the state of knowledge, while attempting to reconcile disparate claims, resolve discrepancies and highlight uncertainties.

"The strength is that the result is a consensus report that isn't necessarily the latest or the greatest," he said, "but it does sort out what can be reliably stated."

The latest IPCC report (2001) reaffirms earlier conclusions the organization reported: The world's climate is changing, and the blame rests principally on humans who are altering the composition of the atmosphere by deforestation and the use of fossil fuels.

The changes can be slowed but not stopped, the report says, because of the long life of several greenhouse gases (>100 years for CO2). It purports that all the climate change the planet is already committed to has yet to manifest itself because of the slow response of the oceans to warming.

Furthermore, major climate changes are projected under all likely future scenarios, with change rates much greater than occur naturally, thereby making them very disruptive in all likelihood.

Human Touch

Natural climate changes are an age-old, ongoing phenomenon. For those who believe human-modification of the environment alters the climate, the impact of fossil fuel combustion ranks pretty much at the top of the culprit list. It's blamed for polluting the atmosphere and altering the balance of radiation on the earth via both visible particulate pollution (aerosols) and gases that alter the makeup of the atmosphere.

"The latter are referred to as greenhouse gases because they are relatively transparent to incoming solar radiation, while they absorb and re-emit outgoing infrared radiation," Trenberth said, "creating a blanketing effect which results in warming.

"Global warming and associated climate change are expected as a result."

Human activities, such as biomass burning, agriculture, fossil fuel use and others, also are blamed for the increase in atmospheric concentration of several other greenhouse gases, e.g. methane, nitrous oxide, chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and the like.

Analyses of surface temperature observations show there has been a global mean warming of about 0.7°C over the past 100 years. The warmest year on record was 1998, and the last 10 years are the warmest decade.

Because of land/ocean contrasts and physical obstacles such as mountain ranges, along with other factors, extensive regions of both above- and below-normal temperatures occur in disparate places at any time.

Emerging Signs

Trenberth noted that changes in climate variability and extremes are beginning to emerge.

Radiation from the sun is the energy source that drives the climate. Roughly 31 percent is scattered or reflected back into space by clouds and the small airborne particles known as aerosols, or by the earth's surface. To balance the incoming energy, the earth has to radiate the same amount of energy back into space on average.

Water vapor, CO2 and other minor gases in the atmosphere absorb some of the thermal radiation leaving the surface and emit radiation from higher and colder levels out into space. This blanketing is the natural greenhouse effect, with water vapor contributing about 60 percent of the effect and CO2 accounting for about 26 percent.

While clouds have a blanketing effect similar to that of greenhouse gases, they act to cool the surface because they are bright reflectors of solar radiation.

Trenberth said the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere has increased by about 31 percent since the industrial revolution began 250 years ago, primarily because of fossil fuel combustion and the removal of forests. Without controls, future projections indicate the rate of increase could accelerate, he added, and concentrations could double from pre-industrial values in the next 50 to 100 years.

It's been reported that even full implementation of the Kyoto Protocol would only slow the time of doubling of CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere from pre-industrial amounts by maybe 15 years unless sizeable further emissions reductions were to occur at some time in the future. Changes occurring in the oceans would continue.

Because certain aerosols scatter some solar radiation back to space, thereby cooling the earth's surface, they directly influence climate. As opposed to aerosols generated by natural causes, man-made aerosol particle formation occurs mainly through sulfur dioxide injection into the atmosphere, which contributes to acid rain.

Whereas such aerosols originate near the surface, for the most part, they can be washed out of the atmosphere by rain. Because they typically stay in the atmosphere for only a few days and tend to concentrate near their sources, such as industrial regions, they can help to mask any global warming triggered by greenhouse gases.

Stormy Weather

Increases in greenhouse gases in the atmosphere are reported to not only increase surface temperatures but also to augment the hydrological cycle because much of the heating at the surface goes into evaporating surface moisture.

"Global temperature increases signify the water-holding capacity of the atmosphere increases," Trenberth said, "and together with enhanced evaporation, this means that the actual atmospheric moisture should increase, which is observed to be happening in many places.

"Because water vapor is a powerful greenhouse gas, this provides a strong positive feedback."

He noted it leads to the expectation of intensified rainfall or snowfall events, such that when it rains it pours harder than it would have under similar circumstances just a couple of decades ago.

"This also provides fuel for storms," he said, "which further enhances rainfall and snowfall intensity, increasing the risk of flooding."

Precipitation in the United States has trended upwards by about 10 percent over the last century, and increased heat for drying means naturally-occurring droughts likely will be intensified. They will come on quicker, plants will wilt sooner and the droughts may become more widespread and last longer with global warming. Once the land is dry, all the solar radiation goes into raising temperatures, Trenberth said, bringing on sweltering heat waves.

Clearly, it's not enough to consider only temperatures when studying the effects of global warming. One must also take into account the air conditioning effects of moisture, along with another part of the picture -- warm regions are often separate from wet regions.

Although some changes arising from global warming are benign or even beneficial, weather extremes, such as floods, can have significant economic impact.

The IPCC estimates that restoring vegetation to its natural state would reduce CO2 by only 5-10 percent in 2100, so there is a strong case to be made for slowing the projected rates of climate change from human influences.

Increased use of renewable resources -- such as solar power -- and increased energy efficiency are seen as key steps to aid in diminishing the rate of climate change Trenberth said -- and, subsequently, achieving a more sustainable world.

You may also be interested in ...