Time Is Proving the Value of 4-D

Reservoir Secrets Being Leaked

The verdicts are arriving -- and the results are looking good.

Time-lapse, or so-called 4-D, seismic technology is proving its worth as a reservoir management tool -- not just on new fields where the technique is applied from inception, but at all stages of a field's lifecycle.

Its value, especially for older fields, is found via pre-production baselines for future monitoring and in conjunction with calibration to well data.

"The high cost of drilling in newer, deep-water assets places much responsibility on seismic data for the characterization of the reservoir, estimating its volumetrics and, through the reservoir simulator, its potential flow performance," said Philip A. F. Christie, scientific advisor for Schlumberger Cambridge Research. "Deep-water reservoirs are often produced through flexible risers to floating production systems, which make re-entry for surveillance logging prohibitively expensive."

Under these conditions time lapse seismic is extremely useful to complement data from permanently installed sensors -- and the good news is a high quality 3-D survey acquired for characterization before first oil can become the reference survey for subsequent reservoir monitoring from first oil through to abandonment.

Christie, who presented a paper on "Time-Lapse Seismic From Exploration Through Abandonment" at the Petroleum Exploration Society of Great Britain's reservoir geophysics seminar held earlier this year, examined published results from four different fields at four different stages from exploration to abandonment, defining how time-lapse seismic was an important tool at all those stages.

"An exploration 3-D seismic survey represents an opportunity to establish a baseline for future time-lapse analyses," he said in his paper, "if the seismic data quality is good enough with measurements of source signature, navigation repeatability, calibrated sensors, together with estimates of uncertainty in these measurements.

"Such a calibrated exploration 3-D survey can be termed 4-D ready."

First at Foinaven

Foinaven, operated by BP 190 kilometers west of the Shetland Islands in 500 meters of water, is the first example of a 4-D project launched before first oil and where the baseline survey was acquired as a dedicated 4-D reference before production.

"Time-lapse seismic is the only practical way of monitoring the field because it is produced through an FPSO," Christie said, "so routine re-entry into the wells to obtain production log information at reservoir level is not an easy option.

"The key reservoir property is that the oil is fully saturated with gas, and that the reservoir pressure is close to bubble point -- the pressure below which free gas will come out of solution in the pore space."

Christie cited a paper written by M. Cooper, J. Bouska, E. Thorogood, A. O'Donovan, P. Kristiansen and P. Christie, "Foinaven Active Reservoir Management: The Time-Lapse Signal," presented at the 1999 SEG annual meeting.

Please log in to read the full article

The verdicts are arriving -- and the results are looking good.

Time-lapse, or so-called 4-D, seismic technology is proving its worth as a reservoir management tool -- not just on new fields where the technique is applied from inception, but at all stages of a field's lifecycle.

Its value, especially for older fields, is found via pre-production baselines for future monitoring and in conjunction with calibration to well data.

"The high cost of drilling in newer, deep-water assets places much responsibility on seismic data for the characterization of the reservoir, estimating its volumetrics and, through the reservoir simulator, its potential flow performance," said Philip A. F. Christie, scientific advisor for Schlumberger Cambridge Research. "Deep-water reservoirs are often produced through flexible risers to floating production systems, which make re-entry for surveillance logging prohibitively expensive."

Under these conditions time lapse seismic is extremely useful to complement data from permanently installed sensors -- and the good news is a high quality 3-D survey acquired for characterization before first oil can become the reference survey for subsequent reservoir monitoring from first oil through to abandonment.

Christie, who presented a paper on "Time-Lapse Seismic From Exploration Through Abandonment" at the Petroleum Exploration Society of Great Britain's reservoir geophysics seminar held earlier this year, examined published results from four different fields at four different stages from exploration to abandonment, defining how time-lapse seismic was an important tool at all those stages.

"An exploration 3-D seismic survey represents an opportunity to establish a baseline for future time-lapse analyses," he said in his paper, "if the seismic data quality is good enough with measurements of source signature, navigation repeatability, calibrated sensors, together with estimates of uncertainty in these measurements.

"Such a calibrated exploration 3-D survey can be termed 4-D ready."

First at Foinaven

Foinaven, operated by BP 190 kilometers west of the Shetland Islands in 500 meters of water, is the first example of a 4-D project launched before first oil and where the baseline survey was acquired as a dedicated 4-D reference before production.

"Time-lapse seismic is the only practical way of monitoring the field because it is produced through an FPSO," Christie said, "so routine re-entry into the wells to obtain production log information at reservoir level is not an easy option.

"The key reservoir property is that the oil is fully saturated with gas, and that the reservoir pressure is close to bubble point -- the pressure below which free gas will come out of solution in the pore space."

Christie cited a paper written by M. Cooper, J. Bouska, E. Thorogood, A. O'Donovan, P. Kristiansen and P. Christie, "Foinaven Active Reservoir Management: The Time-Lapse Signal," presented at the 1999 SEG annual meeting.

He found that on the 1995 baseline survey there was virtually no free gas in the reservoir compartment under analysis. By the 1998 repeat survey, however, the amplitudes were much brighter with gas evolution indicated, even to the oil-water contact, due to the pressure reduction following production.

When amplitudes increase, scientists can deduce that this part of the reservoir is in pressure communication with the producer wells. Also, the consistency of features such as minor faulting in the two surveys adds confidence to a detailed interpretation. Amplitude build-up in the 1998 data to the north of a fault separating two compartments indicates gas evolution that has not breached the fault, although there is reservoir rock on both sides of the fault.

This suggests the fault is sealing at the time of the repeat survey, he said.

"Foinaven demonstrated that 4-D seismic works West of Shetland and provided reservoir-related interpretation," Christie said. "Because all the wells had been drilled by the time of the repeat survey, there is little intervention that can be based upon the results of the 4-D. But the success of the project in delivering reservoir-related information motivated the extension of the technology to other West of Shetland assets.

"Foinaven is a good example of designer 4-D giving results early in a field, which can help to guide the development of the field and manage its production."

The Draugen Field

The Draugen Field, operated by Shell in the North Sea's Norwegian sector, is in the early maturity stage with full plateau production from seven producers in the center of the field and five water injectors at the northern and southern ends of the field.

It includes the worlds most prolific oil well, producing at 76,750 barrels of oil a day. The field has no primary gas cap, but has uncertain connection to the aquifer.

Christie's talk referenced a paper published last year by SEG, "Time-Lapse Seismic Surveys in the North Sea and Their Business Impact," written by K. Koster, P. Gabriels, M. Hartung, J. Verbeek, G. Deinum and R. Staples.

A 3-D survey acquired in 1990 prior to first oil in 1993 was used as a legacy baseline for a repeat survey acquired in 1998 to help determine the optimal location for a new well planned for 1999.

"The Draugen story is one of uncertain support from the aquifer and fault seal," Christie said. "Shell was carrying three reservoir models with different fault transmissivities, all of which matched the production history data equally well and indicate the level of uncertainty in the original model.

"The time-lapse seismic difference maps were able to image the impedance change due to water replacing oil in the reservoir. The seismic best matched one of the reservoir models, though it also indicated that a fault in the north was sealing, since the seismic difference switched off to the south of the fault."

Shell discarded two of the models and manually updated the third until it matched both the seismic and the production history. At this point, Shell had reduced uncertainty by having a model consistent with the seismic and the production.

The manually updated flow model was used to predict the performance of the planned infill well at several alternative locations. The optimal location was found to the north of the platform, rather than the originally planned westerly location, and the resulting delay in anticipated water cut extended the forecasted plateau production by a year and increased predicted recovery by 12 million barrels.

"As a result, in 1999 the new well was successfully drilled at the revised location and an additional two wells have been drilled extending the field life to 2015," Christie said.

"Draugen represents an example of 4-D seismic helping to prolong plateau production."

The Gullfaks Field

The Gullfaks Field, also in the North Sea's Norwegian sector, was discovered in 1984 with first oil two years later. The 3-D used as a baseline was before first oil, but the first repeat survey was in 1995, a year after peak production.

Christie cited a talk presented on the field at last year's EAGE annual meeting, "Four-D Seismic Enhances Oil Recovery and Improves the Reservoir Description," by L.K. Strønen and P. Diagranes.

The geology in the "middle-aged" field is complex with multiple, high porosity and permeability sandstone reservoir units in tilted fault blocks beneath an erosional unconformity with the sealing shales. The reservoir has saturated oil with no free gas and pore pressure is maintained with water injectors.

Base reserves were estimated at 1.3 billion barrels.

"The strongest seismic difference is in the amplitude of the top reservoir," Christie said. "The oil sand is 'softer' than the overlying shale with a lower Poisson's Ratio, so there is a good stack response at the top reservoir in the 1985 data."

By 1995, the reservoir sand had been drained and water had replaced oil in the pore spaces. As a result, the impedance and the Poisson's Ratio had both increased to become closer to the overlying shale, resulting in a dimmer response on the seismic.

The two-way-time of a deeper horizon has also decreased because of the increase in velocity of the produced reservoir rock resulting in a seismic "pull-up" effect, according to Christie.

Seismic inversion was used to map the fluid distributions in 1985 and 1995, using well data to constrain the inversion and to distinguish between possible changes in saturation, temperature and pore pressure. The results show several areas of unchanged oil saturation in both 1985 and 1995, indicating by-passed oil.

The 4-D map was used to guide successful drilling of in-fill wells, accessing an additional 9.5 million barrels of oil and helping to increase recoverable reserves to 1.9 billion barrels. Two more repeat surveys were conducted in 1996 and 1999.

The Sleipner Field

Time-lapse seismic data can even be useful in fields that have reached retirement.

The Sleipner Field, operated by Statoil in the North Sea's Norwegian sector, was discovered in 1974 but production did not commence until 1996. Recoverable reserves are 128 billion cubic meters of gas and 170 million barrels of condensate.

Christie cited another paper presented at the EAGE annual meeting in Glasgow, Scotland, "Reservoir Geology of the Utsira Sand in the Southern Viking Graben Area -- A Site for Potential CO2 Storage," by I. Brevik, O. Eiken, R. Arts, E. Lindeberg and E. Causse. He said carbon dioxide is found in association with the gas in West Sleipner at an unsaleable concentration of 9 percent and is separated offshore for re-injection in an underground storage structure from the East Sleipner platform.

This presented an opportunity for exploring an environmentally acceptable method of carbon dioxide sequestration, and so a European Union-supported project called Saline Aquifer CO2 Storage was established.

The CO2 repository is the massive, brine-filled Utsira sand body, which is 200 meters thick with high porosity and permeability. It is estimated that the sand could accommodate 400 years of Western Europe's CO2 production.

A legacy baseline seismic survey was acquired in 1994, and between the start of injection in 1996 and the repeat survey in 1999, some two million tons of CO2 were injected.

"CO2 arriving at the Sleipner A platform from Sleipner West is injected via an extended reach well into the Utsira Formation," he said. "The 1994 survey, prior to injection, shows the top Utsira Formation, intended to be the top of the storage interval. In the 1999 repeat survey, the water sands have become partially saturated with gas and have dramatically increased amplitudes due to the gas. Its upward migration is indeed contained by the shales above the top Utsira Formation. The progressive push-down effect on deeper horizons due to the low velocity gas is also evident."

According to Christie, this is an example of how 4-D seismic may be used to demonstrate seal integrity in gas storage structures, either for CO2 sequestration or for the storage of associated gas, even after the original oil production has ceased.

"In this sense, monitoring the seal integrity is a motivation for continuing to run monitor surveys to check that the buoyancy forces created by displacing the brine with CO2, together with the increased pressurization of the reservoir, do not cause breakdown of the sealing caprock," he said.

"In the case of Sleipner, the large capacity of the Utsira sand and the presence of the infrastructure may allow CO2 sequestration to continue long after the abandonment of the field as a hydrocarbon producer."

You may also be interested in ...