Curriculum Battles Being Fought

Geology Under Attack

We all know what being ignored means.

And we all know what being attacked means.

While they seem on opposite ends of the spectrum, there are cases when being ignored is the same as being attacked.

In this case, it is the science of geology.

Geology is under attack by being ignored, incredibly, in Texas, where geology has yielded bounty for the state and world; and in California, where geology can become a life-and-death matter.

The attack comes from the education boards of the states, which dictate curriculums and high school graduation requirements.

And in Texas professional geologists with an assist from the American Geological Institute, already are fighting back, 28 distinguished geoscientists — 11 of whom are AAPG members — are testifying at a January hearing in Austin about the importance of the teaching of earth science to student. And, indications are that this group's efforts are having a positive effect and have gotten the attention of the Texas State Board of Education.

Please log in to read the full article

We all know what being ignored means.

And we all know what being attacked means.

While they seem on opposite ends of the spectrum, there are cases when being ignored is the same as being attacked.

In this case, it is the science of geology.

Geology is under attack by being ignored, incredibly, in Texas, where geology has yielded bounty for the state and world; and in California, where geology can become a life-and-death matter.

The attack comes from the education boards of the states, which dictate curriculums and high school graduation requirements.

And in Texas professional geologists with an assist from the American Geological Institute, already are fighting back, 28 distinguished geoscientists — 11 of whom are AAPG members — are testifying at a January hearing in Austin about the importance of the teaching of earth science to student. And, indications are that this group's efforts are having a positive effect and have gotten the attention of the Texas State Board of Education.

The AGI has also lead an earlier letter-writing campaign focused on the Board of Education, which has mustered a number of responses (October 2001 EXPLORER).

But why the attack?

Basically, observers say, both the Texas and California stories are the same — it's because well-meaning reforms have narrowed the focus on the sciences.

In Texas new graduation requirements call for students to take only biology and at least an integrated science course in physics and chemistry. Unless the requirements are expanded or changed, at best earth science will be shuffled to an elective non-core science credit course status.

The state's new curriculum, adopted in 1998, eliminated focused study of earth science in third, fifth and eighth grades as part of a move toward broader "integrated science" classes that touch on each field of science in every grade. The Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills Test, which goes into effect next year, also replaces the eighth grade test with a fifth-grade test.

The change was made to ease the load on eighth-graders, who will take three other tests in the new regimen.

Also, a rule that allowed high school students to take earth science to fulfill science requirements was changed to make earth science only an elective, rather than a core science credit course. Instead, the requirements are biology, chemistry, physics and integrated science.

However, Chris Castillo-Comer, director of science in the Texas Education Agency Division of Curriculum and Professional Development, said downgrading earth science has devalued the course in the minds of the students, since it cannot be counted toward science graduation and not included in the high exit science test. Consequently, geology ranks with physical education and home economics as electives.

Castillo-Comer, a former earth sciences teacher, said less than a quarter of Texas high schools even offer an elective in geology, meteorology and oceanography course.

AAPG members Stan Pittman and David Dunn, both of Dallas, and Edward Roy, of Trinity University, are coordinating the efforts with the Texas Board's Committee on Education.

Following the January testimony, Pittman, Dunn and Roy scheduled a meeting with the Texas Education comissioner to formulate plans to establish a task force made up of members of the Texas Education Agency, which is the implementation arm of the Texas Board of Education,and members of the delegation of geoscientists who made their presentation on Jan. 10.

The task force will be charged with finding ways to put geoscience back into the Texas high school curriculum.

Witnesses at the January hearing in Austin included AAPG members:

  • Past AAPG presidents James A. Gibbs, Dallas, and A.T. "Toby" Carleton, Midland, Texas.
  • James Emme of Anadarko Petroleum, Houston.
  • Astronaut James F. Reilly II, Houston.
  • Robert Gregory of Southern Methodist University, Dallas.
  • Marsha Bourque of Conoco, Houston.
  • John Wickham of the University of Texas at Arlington.
  • William Stephens Jr. of Gunn Oil, Wichita Falls.
  • Paul Strunk of American Shoreline, Corpus Christi.
  • Edward C. Roy of Trinity University, San Antonio.
  • A.R. Green of ExxonMobil, Houston.
  • Marcus Milling, AGI executive director, who gave testimony for past AAPG president Michel T. Halbouty.

AGI's education director Michael J. Smith noted that the National Science Education Standards and the Benchmarks for Science Literacy "bring earth science into parity with the study of biology, chemistry and physics at the high school level."

He said that in 37 states, students can enroll in an earth science course which counts toward science credit required for high school graduation, and that of the 43 states that have high science tests 32 of them include or are planning to include earth science content on high school exit exams and assessments.

Gibbs told the board that "earth science courses instill interest and comprehension in the scientific method and lead students onward into study of the 'pure' sciences: chemistry, physics and more advanced mathematics," because they can see and experience "real world" applications of their studies in their environment each day.

Astronaut Reilly agreed, saying "an advantage to many students, myself among them, is that earth sciences are not in the abstract."

Conoco geologist Bourque noted the irony that her native New York state includes earth science as a core science credit course, but her own child "who attends high school in the shadow of the west Houston petroleum center, does not have a similar opportunity."

Pittman noted that the issue will be ongoing. Watch for further developments.

You may also be interested in ...