Toward the Revitalization of AAPG

“You don’t look like that anymore,” a good friend recently observed in reference to the headshot that I use in EXPLORER and other professional spaces. “You need a new picture!”

A quick glance in the mirror confirms her point and is a not-so-subtle reminder that time marches ever onward, and as it does both we and the world around us are in a state of change.

The same is true for mission-driven organizations, like AAPG. We don’t often think about groups in this way, but associations also follow a predictable life cycle:

  • The development phase of conception, infancy, puberty
  • The mature phase of young adulthood and adulthood
  • The declining phase of late adulthood and old age

I first encountered this framework attending a seminar conducted by ASAE – The Center for Association Leadership and Tecker International, a consultancy. The seminar leaders asked us to identify what phase of the life cycle best described our respective organizations.

An organization proceeding through old age will descend into obscurity and ultimately dissolution, the instructors explained. But this isn’t a foregone conclusion. Associations have the opportunity to experience revitalization, to step back and reimagine the organization based on present reality – to turn the clock back and assure its continued relevance to its members and profession.

“An organization proceeding through old age will descend into obscurity and ultimately dissolution ... But this isn’t a foregone conclusion. Associations have the opportunity to experience revitalization.”

AAPG may be 105 years old, but it’s this revitalization process that your Executive Committee is currently engaged in together with several strategic working groups.

Please log in to read the full article

“You don’t look like that anymore,” a good friend recently observed in reference to the headshot that I use in EXPLORER and other professional spaces. “You need a new picture!”

A quick glance in the mirror confirms her point and is a not-so-subtle reminder that time marches ever onward, and as it does both we and the world around us are in a state of change.

The same is true for mission-driven organizations, like AAPG. We don’t often think about groups in this way, but associations also follow a predictable life cycle:

  • The development phase of conception, infancy, puberty
  • The mature phase of young adulthood and adulthood
  • The declining phase of late adulthood and old age

I first encountered this framework attending a seminar conducted by ASAE – The Center for Association Leadership and Tecker International, a consultancy. The seminar leaders asked us to identify what phase of the life cycle best described our respective organizations.

An organization proceeding through old age will descend into obscurity and ultimately dissolution, the instructors explained. But this isn’t a foregone conclusion. Associations have the opportunity to experience revitalization, to step back and reimagine the organization based on present reality – to turn the clock back and assure its continued relevance to its members and profession.

“An organization proceeding through old age will descend into obscurity and ultimately dissolution ... But this isn’t a foregone conclusion. Associations have the opportunity to experience revitalization.”

AAPG may be 105 years old, but it’s this revitalization process that your Executive Committee is currently engaged in together with several strategic working groups.

An IMAGE of Revitalization

The International Meeting for Applied Geoscience and Energy, our annual meeting, is concluding as this issue of EXPLORER hits your inbox. This new meeting, conducted jointly with the Society for Exploration Geophysicists and in cooperation with SEPM, was an opportunity to test new concepts and ideas for the future.

IMAGE reveals three core elements that I believe are essential to AAPG’s revitalized future.

The first is energy.

When AAPG was created in 1917, the value of and uses for petroleum were just being fully recognized, and over the ensuing century these have grown dramatically.

When we talk about oil and natural gas serving as the foundation of modern society, we’re not referring just to primary energy sources. That is important, of course, but the pervasive use of petroleum products as feedstock for the products used daily and the global food supply is staggering.

Yes, there are other sources of energy: from biomass to coal, geothermal to nuclear, solar and wind. None of them match oil and natural gas, neither on their own nor in aggregate. Each has a role to play, but oil and natural gas are fundamental. We need to help a new generation of geoscientists understand this well enough to want to be a part of our profession and develop the knowledge and skills to be able to educate their peers.

The second core element is applied geoscience.

AAPG is a professional organization with a focus on applying the geosciences. Many of our members apply geoscience to discovering and developing energy sources. Others are adapting those skills to develop new ways to store carbon in the subsurface or minimize the environmental impact of hydrocarbon development. Still others apply technology and understanding from oil and gas systems to geothermal energy development.

Our SEG colleagues have worked over the years to highlight the myriad ways that geophysics can be used to solve problems. The near-surface geophysics pavilion at IMAGE showcased this. And SEG’s Geoscientists Without Borders program, also supported by the AAPG Foundation, helps people throughout the developing world by applying geoscience to solve specific problems.

Fundamental geoscience research is certainly worthwhile and important, but what makes AAPG different from our more academic sister societies is our focus on application: we use geoscience to create value.

The third core element is community.

Mission-driven organizations like AAPG exist because of a fundamental truth: an individual alone cannot achieve and accomplish the mission. Rather, it is a group of individuals coming together, pushing beyond what is known, sharing knowledge and learning from each other by which the community achieves its goal.

Accept the World As It Is

A revitalized AAPG must be community-focused, global in its scope, embrace diverse viewpoints and perspectives and work cooperatively and respectfully toward our goal to advance geoscience and use it effectively to benefit people.

Your elected leadership is committed to getting this strategic review right. These core elements represent my perspective and viewpoint. What are your thoughts about what we need to focus on in a revitalized AAPG? Please let us know.

Successfully revitalizing AAPG is possible. But it does require the willingness to understand and accept reality. We cannot design an organization for the way we wish or hope things could be.

This point was driven home to me when my colleague Matt Randolph informed me that he took the headshot above in 2012. That’s my present reality.

Comments (4)

Directors Column
I read Dave’s and Steve’s September Director and President columns with interest. They both point our that the failure of the SPE merger proposal has not changed the twin challenges of declining membership and revenue-loosing conference model. I await the attendance and revenue reports of the August IMAGE conference. Hopefully $90-100/bbl oil has rejuvenated interest from our sponsors and members for attending the annual and local meetings, and diminished the past hand-wringing of our corporate advisory board and their concern of their ability to provide continued financial support. The IMAGE model shows that societies need not to merge to be able to organize joint meetings. Why industry would not want to continue to support the premier scientific and engineering societies that continue to promote the advancement of petroleum exploration and development. I have no problem with AAPG promoting non-hydrocarbon geological energy sources, such as through the Energy Minerals Division. There clearly is interest by some of our members in geothermal and storing and utilizing carbon dioxide to extract petroleum reserves. However, I do not think AAPG needs to compete with or support the well-established mineral mining industry and their geological organizations. Call me old school, but I prefer to see AAPG to continue with its mission to promote the advancement of petroleum geology.
9/9/2022 11:03:33 AM
I have to wonder if Revitalization is the right concept!
I enjoyed reading Dave’s comments and believe that he is spot on. However, I struggle, at least a wee bit, with the concept of revitalization. It is true that we have slowed and diminished in membership and activities, we were once more vital than we are at present, with “vital” implying the second Oxford Dictionary meaning of “full of energy, lively”. To gain our energy back as a meaningful organization is critical to our historic mission. However, that implies the first Oxford meaning of “absolutely necessary or important, essential”. This is what we really need to work on. Every day in my work we use the terms “mission essential” and “critical” for various projects and activities. My question, which will be offensive to some, “is AAPG, currently, and under a revitalized oil and gas schema absolutely necessary or important, essential”? The last few years membership and funding support would seem to indicate not, even though we all know that oil and gas will continue to be a major global energy source for decades to come. How do we change our schema? Whether we agree or not, the world, and science, has declared that future mechanical and thermal energy must eventually be derived from electricity progressively not generated by breaking hydrocarbon bonds, although hydrocarbon will be an industrial feedstock for a very long time. We are the best geoscientist on our planet but have concentrated on one thing for far too long. No scientific thinkers are better than us in understanding and managing our planetary resources, especially energy and mineral resources, and the reaction of nature to all that we do. Oil and gas is critical, but we must broaden, much more than we historically have, our view of the integration of all natural resources and technologies, broaden our personal science background, even engineering background, and become the planetary energy scientists we all can be, and most of us already know how to do. It is the only way towards future vitality!
9/8/2022 2:37:31 PM
Association of Energy Scientists?
Petroleum and American are integral to the title of the society. It is obvious that the society is way more than American. The tougher question is the word Petroleum. I would posit that Petroleum is integral to the mission of the society and that geothermal, energy minerals, ground water, etcetera are not. I don’t want to besmirch members that might do all their work in those other disciplines but what is the focus of the society? When I began my career over 40 years ago I maintained membership in several more ‘academically’ inclined societies, one of which was the GSA. The GSA articles were interesting but eventually the AAPG literature was more germane and I dropped my GSA membership. If Petroleum is dropped we become the Association of American Geologists, ignoring the international membership. If Petroleum and American are dropped we are the Association of Geologists – not very descriptive and probably would lead to confusion with the AGI, and the GSA and another organization to which I belong –SIPES. SIPES is the Society of Independent Professional Earth Scientists, composed of engineers, geologists and geophysicists that own their own companies or are consultants in oil and gas, remote sensing, environmental and anything else you can imagine (a big tent). I think the AAPG might rename itself to the APG – Association of Petroleum Geoscientists – this takes in all countries and at least geologists and geophysicists, but remains tied to petroleum. Then there is also a lot of soul-searching should we refocus to just petroleum or continue to devolve into other energy sectors. This leads me to my name recommendation: Association of Energy Scientists – now, that is a very large tent.
9/1/2022 1:43:38 PM
We don't look like that any more, but what should we look like?.... oh wait... OMG that means we have to CHANGE!!!
As usual, David's column is spot on. What we as members must embrace is that IF we are no longer what we were in 1917 or 2017, what are we now? Or harder still, what do we want to be? WE - that is ALL of US need to try to understand why our voting membership fallen consistently for more than 30 years. The easy answer might be: "Well, folks today just aren't joiners." This is partly true, but the concept of relevance keeps popping up. AAPG by its name speaks to American and Petroleum. We are now a global organization and have been for a long time. And, we do a LOT more than just O&G. The time has come for some very serious soul searching by AAPG. Are we O&G, or are we Energy? Are we willing to embrace integration with engineering & geophysics like most companies these days, or are we just rock knockers? Do we meet the needs of our members who work in the multi-national & national oil companies that pay our bills, and do we meet the needs of the mom & pop independents who produce a lot of the oil in the Americas? How many hats can we wear and how do we figure which ones provide the greatest benefit to society at large? These and many more questions are the issues that our incoming Exec Committee faces. Please submit your suggestions to David Curtiss or Steven Goolsby and make your voice heard!
9/1/2022 12:44:23 PM

You may also be interested in ...