Going Quietly into the Night?

I am amazed that the members of AAPG go so quietly into night as unfounded fears of carbon dioxide drive their careers, jobs and companies into oblivion. Geologists own Earth Time. Why aren’t you loudly using Earth temperature history to obliviate the already falsified anthropogenic climate panic? I don’t know what the social agenda is that underlies the panic, but I do know this: It’s been getting colder for 4,000 years.

If only climate scientists understood recent history they wouldn’t depend on their theory-biased computer models to forecast dire warming. The minuscule temperature rise we have recently experienced, whatever the cause, is inconsequential noise in the context of temperature history. The professed need to restrict warming to 1.5 or 2.0 degrees Celsius is an artificial construct, with no scientific basis.

Please log in to read the full article

I am amazed that the members of AAPG go so quietly into night as unfounded fears of carbon dioxide drive their careers, jobs and companies into oblivion. Geologists own Earth Time. Why aren’t you loudly using Earth temperature history to obliviate the already falsified anthropogenic climate panic? I don’t know what the social agenda is that underlies the panic, but I do know this: It’s been getting colder for 4,000 years.

If only climate scientists understood recent history they wouldn’t depend on their theory-biased computer models to forecast dire warming. The minuscule temperature rise we have recently experienced, whatever the cause, is inconsequential noise in the context of temperature history. The professed need to restrict warming to 1.5 or 2.0 degrees Celsius is an artificial construct, with no scientific basis.

What ice core data tell us is that we are nearly 3 degrees C colder than where we were 4,000 years ago, and that temperatures are just now climbing out of the longest coldest time of the last 10,000 years. A deeper dive into geologic history shows that carbon dioxide levels today are a shadow of past concentrations. Today’s concentrations are nearly the lowest ever since plant life began so many millions of years ago. Any global increase in carbon dioxide will be beneficial and have nearly no impact on future temperature. We can hope that there is continued warming, because cold kills.

Why, then, are so many trying to demonize fossil fuels? The very fuels that allow them the leisure to worry about climate change instead of struggling to stay alive? Global society is absolutely dependent upon cheap and plentiful energy for its survival. Why would some demand that society retreat from useful energy sources to bring back mass starvation, poverty and horse-drawn buggies?

To dream of a utopian world is admirable, but to inflict suffering upon society through ignorance of science is deplorable. Ignoring the meticulous scientific contributions of eminent physical scientists such as Alley, Davis, Dansgaard and Lindzen deprives humanity of its precious innovation and creativity only for ideology.

The public is “protected” from empirical data by legacy and social media censors. We thus suffer the consequences of unwarranted regulatory intrusions into daily life, whether it be restrictions on heating, air conditioning, dishwashers and stoves or the increased price and availability of electricity.

There is no global climate crisis. There is a global knowledge crisis.

Editor’s Note: As in any commentary published in the AAPG EXPLORER, the opinions expressed here are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect those of the EXPLORER staff or of AAPG collectively, nor its leaders.

Comments (2)

Disgraceful of AAPG to continue wityh anti-scientific rhetoric on Climate Science
AAPG is supposed to be, first and foremost, a scientific society. So, why are the ediotrs allowing a completely erroneous, counter-factual and anti-scientific opinion piece? The disclaimer from the AAPG editors does not remove them of the responsibility to publish logically valid opinions. All of the main points and claims made by Lee Gerhard are false, and contradicted by the peer reviewed published evidence that is readily available. So, why is the AAPG condoning scientific falsehoods? Obvious falsehoods are his claims that climate scientists are unaware of past climates (um, huge numbers of cliamte scientists are geologists, and the IPCC reports include hundreds of pages on past climates) and that global temps were 3deg colder 4000 years ago (See Osman et al., 2021 in Nature). Lee Gerhardt is entitled to his opinions, and if he wished to spout completely false claims on climate science, then he may do so. However, the AAPG should NOT be giving a platform to such falsehoods. Why did AAPG make no effort to fact check this piece? And please do not say that AAPG is just publishing these falsehoods in the name of 'balance'. Balance means giving both sides - and the AAPG Explorer does not make any effort to educate people on the facts of climate science, and yet frequently publishes absolute rubbish like this opinion piece. If the AAPG wants to move into the future and showcase being a respectable scientific organisation, then the AAPG really needs to seek actual climate scientists to present educational pieces debunking these tired old and long disproved climate denial tropes. How about it AAPG editors? Why not encourage a brief article each issue that uses the peer-reviewed science to actually educate members against long debunked denial claims? Is AAPG unwilling to allow mainstream climate science into it's pages? Or is it just going to keep driving away good scientists by only ever propagating the views of non-experts?
9/11/2024 8:56:42 PM
Lee Gerhard: finally an AAPG member speaks the truth
Lee: thank you so much for your clear thinking. Too many of our fellow AAPG members have bent the knee to the altar of the Climate Industrial Complex and willingly abandon their scientific principles for illusory financial benefits promoting an unneeded energy transition. As you referenced, Earth's ecosystems and humanity are benefiting from modest warming and more CO2.
8/17/2024 4:15:23 PM

You may also be interested in ...